Inland Empire Utilities Agency's Routine Maintenance of Multiple Basins for Groundwater Recharge Project

28 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2002011116
Lead Agency
Inland Empire Utilities Agency (Inland Empire Utility Agency)
Document Title
Inland Empire Utilities Agency's Routine Maintenance of Multiple Basins for Groundwater Recharge Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
CDFG is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA #1600-2009-0072-R6) pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, represented by Mr. Thomas A. Love, 6075 Kimball Avenue, City of Chino, State of California, 91710, Ph. (909) 993-1600. The Applicant is proposing to continue conducting the operation and maintenance of their existing groundwater recharge facilities within the Chino Basin. The project will enable the Inland Empire Utilities Agency's existing facilities within the Chino Basin to operate and function to their design capacity for groundwater recharge. Impact to jurisdictional waters of the state will result from the Inland Empire Utilities Agency's ongoing operation and maintenance of their existing facilities.

Contact Information
Michael D. Flores
CA Department of Fish and Game
Inland Deserts Region 6 4665 Lampson Avenue, Suite J
Los Alamitos, CA 90720

909-987-8397

Location

Coordinates
33°59'19"N 117°44'03"W
Cities
Chino Hills
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Galloping Hills Rd
Total Acres
~10
Jobs
1800
State Highways
SR 71
Waterways
Little Chino Creek
Township
2S
Range
8W
Section
No
Base
SBB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
N/A

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search