Inland Empire Utilities Agency's Routine Maintenance of Multiple Basins for Groundwater Recharge Project
29 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002011116
Lead Agency
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Document Title
Inland Empire Utilities Agency's Routine Maintenance of Multiple Basins for Groundwater Recharge Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/30/2010
Document Description
CDFG is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA #1600-2009-0072-R6) pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, represented by Mr. Thomas A. Love, 6075 Kimball Avenue, City of Chino, State of California, 91710, Ph. (909) 993-1600. The Applicant is proposing to continue conducting the operation and maintenance of their existing groundwater recharge facilities within the Chino Basin. The project will enable the Inland Empire Utilities Agency's existing facilities within the Chino Basin to operate and function to their design capacity for groundwater recharge. Impact to jurisdictional waters of the state will result from the Inland Empire Utilities Agency's ongoing operation and maintenance of their existing facilities.
Contact Information
Name
Michael D. Flores
Agency Name
CA Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Chino Hills
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Galloping Hills Rd
Total Acres
~10
Jobs
1800
State Highways
SR 71
Waterways
Little Chino Creek
Township
2S
Range
8W
Section
No
Base
SBB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.