Implementation of the Escondido Research and Technology Center Specific Plan
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001121065
Lead Agency
City of Escondido
Document Title
Implementation of the Escondido Research and Technology Center Specific Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/31/2003
Present Land Use
General Plan Designation/Tier: Industrial Park
Zoning: SP-Specific Plan
Document Description
CDFG is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1603 (SAA #R5-2002-0363) of the Fish and Game Code to project applicant Mr. James McCann representing JRMC Real Estate Corporation. The application proposes to alter the streambed within six unnamed drainages, tributaries to Escondido Creek, to accommodate the construction of Escondido Research and Technology Center. The project is the development of a multi-use business park with associated utilities and infrastructure, including a major roadway (proposed Citracado Parkway) and an electric power generating facility. A mitigation area for wetland impacts resulting from the project is also located on-site. The project impacts 0.22 acres of streambed and 0.03 acre seasonal pond.
Contact Information
Name
Diana Delgadillo
Agency Name
City of Escondido/Planning Division
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Escondido
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Vineyard Road and Andreasen Drive
Zip
92025
Total Acres
200 acres
State Highways
I-15, Hwy 78
Waterways
Escondido Creek
Other Location Info
Future Citracado Parkway Extension
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.