Mad River Water Pipeline Rehabilitation Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001012088
Lead Agency
City of Eureka
Document Title
Mad River Water Pipeline Rehabilitation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/8/2002
Present Land Use
Agriculture, Natural Resources, Public Facilities, Commercial, Residential
Document Description
The purpose of the Mad River Water Pipeline Rehabilitation Project is to assure the reliability of the primary water supply for the residents of Humboldt County served by Humboldt Community Services District. The project generally includes two elements: 1) the construction of a pipeline in parallel and cross-connected with the existing water pipeline through the diked former tidelands between Arcata and Eureka, including a one mile section within Old Arcata Road/Myrtle Avenue in the Indianola area; and 2) the slip-lining of sections of the existing pipeline to within public streets, north of Samoa Boulevard in Arcata, and south of Ryan Slough pump station in Eureka and its outskirts.
Contact Information
Name
Lisa Shikany
Agency Name
Community Development Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Arcata, Eureka
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Diamond Drive, L. K. Wood Boulevard, A & B Street, 11th Street, Samoa Boulevard, Old Arcata Road
State Highways
101
Waterways
Mad River and Samoa Peninsula
Township
6N,5N
Range
1E,1W
Base
H.M.
Other Information
Cross Streets: Myrtle Avenue, Walker Point Ridge, and Frank Street
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City Council of the City of Eureka
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.