Proposed Improvements to the Interstate 5 / Hasley Canyon Road Interchange
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001011048
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 7
Document Title
Proposed Improvements to the Interstate 5 / Hasley Canyon Road Interchange
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/26/2005
Present Land Use
Transportation
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2004-0477-R5 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, County of Los Angeles. The applicant proposes to alter the streambed to widen the existing bridge over Castaic Creek and relocating an existing 12-inch potable waterline the facilitate the proposed bridge widening. A temporary waterline will be used. Riprap will be installed along the channel banks of Castaic Creek at the upstream end of the existing bridge for slope protection. An approximate 80-foot-wide temporary construction work crossings will be used on the upstream and downstream side of the bridge. The project will impact 0.23 acres permanently and 0.94 acres temporarily. The project is located in the City of Santa Clarita in Los Angeles County.
Contact Information
Name
Betty Courtney
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Santa Clarita
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
I-5/Hasley Canyon Road
State Highways
126
Waterways
Castaic Creek
Township
4N
Range
1
Section
17W
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.