Campus Parkway Project
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000121003
Lead Agency
Merced County
Document Title
Campus Parkway Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/4/2018
Present Land Use
Existing land uses is primarily agricultural. Planned land use varies from: Industrial, One-Acre Rural Residential, Low Density Residential, Regional Commercial, Business Park, and Agriculture.
Document Description
To remove an existing private bridge and to construct three new bridges crossing Black Rascal creek. The northbound bridge will be single span, 38.5 feet long and 39 feet wide, and the southbound bridge will be single span, 38.5 feet long and 53.5 feet wide. The third bridge will be a private bridge to replace the existing private bridge and will be constructed just downstream of the proposed two new bridges. The new private bridge will be single span, 38.5 feet long and 17 feet wide.
Contact Information
Name
James Herota
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Merced
Counties
Merced
Cross Streets
Yosemite Ave., north of Bradley Lateral Rd and East Olive Ave
Zip
95340
State Highways
SR 99, SR 140
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Pioneer Elementary, Weaver, Golden Valley HS
Waterways
Bear Creek, Black Rascal Creek
Township
7S
Range
14E
Section
15, 22
Base
MDBM
Other Information
Section: 27, 34
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.