Campus Master Plan Revision and Schematic Plans for the National Training Center/Sports Complex
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000101041
Lead Agency
California State University Board of Trustees
Document Title
Campus Master Plan Revision and Schematic Plans for the National Training Center/Sports Complex
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/5/2001
Document Description
The proposed campus master plan revision provides for: 20,000 seat soccer stadium, expandable to 27,000; 8,000 seat tennis stadium, expandable to 13,000; Six additional soccer fields; 135,000 gross square foot facility to house the locker rooms, training rooms, coaches offices, food services, administrative offices and other supporting space; Eighteen additional regulation tennis courts; Relocation and reconstruction of the velodrome, baseball and softball fields; Addition of 3,900 parking spaces; Relocation of a segment of the campus road system and a 3-mile jogging trail.
Contact Information
Name
George Pardon
Agency Name
Board of Trustees, California State University
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Carson
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Avalon Boulevard, Victoria Street, University Drive
Zip
90747
Total Acres
125
State Highways
I-405, SR-91
Airports
Compton
Schools
CSUDH and Carson School District
Waterways
Dominguez Channel, Compton Creek
Township
3S
Range
13W
Section
91
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
The Board of Trustees
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.