Elverta Specific Plan, Elverta West 10 Plus APN 202-0080-020
24 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2000092026
- Lead Agency
- Sacramento County
- Document Title
- Elverta Specific Plan, Elverta West 10 Plus APN 202-0080-020
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 11/14/2016
- Present Land Use
- Ag-Res/Agricultural Residential, Residential, Commercial, Open Space, Detention, Recreation
- Document Description
- The RWQCB is issuing a 401 Water Quality Certification for the subject Project. The project consists of mass grading approx. 1,745 acres to prepare for future residential development, paved streets, underground utilities, and other associated improvements. All impacts to waters of the U.S. will be from grading activities. The project will permanently impact 0.409 acres of waters of the U.S.
- Contact Information
-
Stephanie Tadlock
Central Valley Regional Water Board
11020 Sun Center Drive #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 464-4644
Location
- Counties
- Sacramento
- Cross Streets
- Elverta Road / 16th Street
- Total Acres
- 1,734
- Parcel #
- Numerous
- Railways
- SPRR/WPRR
- Airports
- McClellan AFB, Rio Linda Airport
- Waterways
- Dry Creek
- Township
- 10N
- Range
- 5E
- Section
- 9,10,
- Base
- MDBM
- Other Location Info
- City/Nearest Community: Rio Linda/Elverta
- Other Information
- Section: 15,16,21,22
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- RWQCB
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 11020 Sun Center Dr., Suite 200, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- Yes
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes