The Draft EIR concluded that the proposed electronic freeway sign would be significantly larger than existing signs in the area and that some people could find the height, area of sign, location, brightness, and message center components of the sign objectionable (primarily residential areas southwest of the project site in the City of Redondo Beach). This section has been revised to conclude that although aesthetics is subjective and relative to the "eye of the beholder," aesthetic impacts could be potentially significant and unavoidable to some nearby residents. This section also presents additional information regarding the setting, thresholds, impacts, cumulative impacts, mitigation measures, and level of significance after mitigation.
Aesthetics, Cumulative Effects, Growth Inducement, Other
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, South Coast Region 5 (CDFW), California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Department of Transportation, Division of Transportation Planning (DOT), California Highway Patrol, California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region 4 (RWQCB), California State Lands Commission (SLC), Resources Agency, California Department of Transportation, District 7 (DOT)
Reviewing Agency Comments
California Department of Transportation, District 7 (DOT)
The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public.
To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.
You may also contact the OPR via email at firstname.lastname@example.org or via phone at (916) 445-0613.