Murrieta Creek Draft Feasibility Report and EIS/EIR
9 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000071051
Lead Agency
United States Army, Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE)
Document Title
Murrieta Creek Draft Feasibility Report and EIS/EIR
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/25/2003
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The proposed project consists of the construction, operation and maintenance of a flood control channel and multi-purpose detention basin with the hydraulic capacity to convey the 100-year tributary flow between the U.S.G.S. Stream Gauge, south of Old Town Temecula and Tenaja Road in the city of Murrieta. The proposed project also includes the construction of a recreational trail system, a regional sports park, bridge replacements and environmental restoration. The proposed channel section is primarily earthen with gabions or buried riprap/soil cement bank protection placed only where necessary. The construction of the wider channel section will allow for the development of an unmaintained riparian corridor within the channel prism.
Contact Information
Name
Zully Smith
Agency Name
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Murrieta, Temecula, Wildomar
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
I-15, McVicar Street; Rancho California Road
Total Acres
11 linear miles
State Highways
79
Waterways
Murrieta Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.