Battle Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration Project
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000042043
Lead Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Document Title
Battle Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/15/2008
Present Land Use
Agricultural
Document Description
The Battle Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration Project will reestablish approx. 42 mi. of Chinook salmon and steelhead habitat in the north and south forks of Battle Creek, plus an additional 6 mi. of habitat on its tributaries. Restoration will be accomplished primarily through the modification of the existing Battle Creek Hydroelectric Project facilities and operations, including instream flow releases. Facility and operational modifications will be on a scale where habitat improvement goals can be met without excessive loss of renewable electric generation. Specifically, the Restoration Project is intended to benefit the Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon, state and federally listed as threatened; the Sacramento River winter run Chinook salmon, state and federally listed as endangered; and the Central Valley steelhead, state and federally listed as threatened.
Contact Information
Name
Jeffrey Parks
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Anderson, Red Bluff
Counties
Shasta, Tehama
Waterways
Battle Creek, tributary to the Sacramento River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.