Addendum No. 1 to the Optimum Basin Management Program PEIR Project
19 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000041047
Lead Agency
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Document Title
Addendum No. 1 to the Optimum Basin Management Program PEIR Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/20/2017
Document Description
The Basin is located primarily in San Bernardino County, with a lesser portion of the project area overlying Riverside County and a very small section located in eastern Los Angeles County. Chino Basin is bounded:
On the north by the San Gabriel mountains and the Cucamonga Basin;
On the east by the Rialto-Colton Basin, Jurupa Hills, and Pedley Hills;
On the south by the La Sierra area, the Santa Ana River and the Temescal Basin; and
On the west by the Chino Hills, Puente Hills, and the Pomona and Claremont Basins.
The principal drainage course for the Basin is the Santa Ana River. It flows 69 miles across the Santa Ana Watershed from its origin in the San Bernardino Mountains to the Pacific Ocean. The Santa Ana River enters the Basin at the Riverside Narrows and flows along the southern boundary to the Prado Flood Control Reservoir where it is eventually discharged through the outlet at Prado Dam into Orange County.
Fundamentally, the purpose of this Addendum addresses a proposal by watermaster for a temporary increase in the Safe Storage Capacity from 500,000 AF to 600,000 AF for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2021.
Contact Information
Name
Sylvie Lee
Agency Name
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
San Bernardino
State Highways
60, I-15, I-10
Railways
UPRR, BNSF
Airports
Ontario, Chino
Schools
Several
Waterways
Several: Chino, Cucamonga, San Servaine
Base
SBB&M
Other Location Info
Several
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.