Chino Basin Optimum Basin Management Program

19 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2000041047
Lead Agency
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Document Title
Chino Basin Optimum Basin Management Program
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/13/2010
Document Description
The proposed project has two main features: the expansion of the desalter program such that the groundwater pumping for the desalters will reach 40,000 acre-ft/yr and that the pumping will occur in amounts and at locations that contribute to the achievement of hydraulic control; and the strategic reduction in groundwater storage (Re-Operation) that, along with the expanded desalter program, significantly achieves hydraulic control for the Chino Groundwater Basin. Through Re-Operation and pursuant to a Judgment Amendment, Watermaster will engage in controlled overdraft and use up to a maximum of 400,000 acre-ft of groundwater to off-set desalter replenishment through 2030. A new well field, referred to as the Chino Creek Well Field, will be installed and operated. The treatment capacity of Desalter II will be increased from 10,400acre-ft/yr to about 21,000 acre-ft/yr, which corresponds to the raw water pumping requirement of 11,800 acre-ft/yr expanding to 23,9000 acre-ft/yr. The new product water developed at Desalter II would be conveyed to the Jurupa Community Services District , the City of Ontario, and/or Western Municipal Water District through existing and new pipelines.

Contact Information

Name
Ryan Shaw
Agency Name
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
San Bernardino
State Highways
60, I-15, I-10
Railways
UPRR, BNSF
Airports
Ontario, Chino
Schools
Several
Waterways
Several: Chino, Cucamonga, San Servaine
Base
SBB&M
Other Location Info
Several

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print