Project 98-141; Tentative Tract 52715; Conditional Use Permit 98-141- (5); Oak Tree Permit 98-141-(5)
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000021050
Lead Agency
Los Angeles County
Document Title
Project 98-141; Tentative Tract 52715; Conditional Use Permit 98-141- (5); Oak Tree Permit 98-141-(5)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/4/2002
Present Land Use
Vacant/RPD (Residential Planned Development)/Non-Urban.
Document Description
California Department of Fish Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA# R5-2001-0370) pursuant to Section 1603 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Mitchell Development, Inc., 31225 La Baya Drive, #102, Westlake Village, CA 91362. The applicant proposes to fill 0.28 of unnamed streams for the development of 8 lots; a ninth lot will be donated to the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. The preserve streambed will be 0.72 acres plus 0.02 acres within the development. The project is located in the unincorporated area near Santa Clarita in Los Angeles County.
Contact Information
Name
Betty Courtney
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Santa Clarita
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
terminus of Running Horse Road & Tenderfoot Road, north of Placerita Canyon Road
Total Acres
83.9
Township
4N
Range
15W
Section
33
Base
SBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.