City in the Hills
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000011101
Lead Agency
City of Bakersfield
Document Title
City in the Hills
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/20/2000
Present Land Use
Open Space, Present Zoning: Agriculture (A) and One Family Dwelling (R-1) Present General Plan Designation: Mixed Use Commercial (MUC), Low Density Residential (LR), and High Density Residential (HR).
Document Description
The project is an amendment to the Land Use Element and the Circulation Element of the Metropolitan Bakersfield 2010 General Plan and a concurrent zone change. The proposed Land Use and Circulation Element Amendment and the Zone Change will consist of boundary realignments of the Low Density Residential (2750 Units), High Density Residential (1,300 units) , and Commercial (1,048,706 square feet) land use designations and zoning districts. Proposed Circulation Element amendments include the addition of new arterial and collector street alignments within the development site.
Contact Information
Name
Marc Gauthier
Agency Name
City of Bakersfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
State Highway 178, Masterson Lane, Paladino Drive, Vineland Road
State Highways
178
Airports
Rio Bravo
Schools
2 Elementary, 2 Middle, 2 High Schools
Waterways
Kern River
Township
29S
Range
29E
Section
17-20
Base
USGS
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Stanley Conley
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.