Route 46 Corridor Improvement Project - Cholame Section
17 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2000011033
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans, District 5 - San Luis Obispo/Santa Barbara (California Department of Transportation, District 5)
- Document Title
- Route 46 Corridor Improvement Project - Cholame Section
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 5/7/2020
- Project Applicant
- California Department of Transportation
- Document Description
- The Cholame Section is the third section of the Corridor Project. As with the previously constructed sections, the Cholame Section would continue with the widening of the Route 46 Corridor from a two-lane highway to a four-lane divided expressway. Construction of the Cholame Section would begin at PM 49.7, approximately 0.2 miles east of the Shandon Roadside Rest Area and would continue to post mile 54.7, approximately 0.5 miles west of the State Route 41/46 intersection.
- Contact Information
-
Lucas Marsalek
Caltrans, District 5
50 Higuera St
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Phone : (805) 549-3626
lucas.marsalek@dot.ca.gov
Location
- Counties
- San Luis Obispo
- State Highways
- 46
- Other Location Info
- post mile 49.7 to 54.7
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Caltrans
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- A hard copy or digital pdf of the Final Environmental Document is available by request. Please contact Lucas Marsalek, Associate Environmental Planner, via email lucas.marsalek@dot.ca.gov or by phone (805) 549-3626
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- Yes
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes (Updated Environmental Assessment with Finding of No Significant Impact)
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes