Los Angeles Eastside Corridor Light Rail Transit Build Alternative Option B

7 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1999081061
Lead Agency
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Document Title
Los Angeles Eastside Corridor Light Rail Transit Build Alternative Option B
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/4/2002
Present Land Use
Urban area, residential and commercial activities, project consistent with present land uses, zoning, and general plan designations.
Document Description
The project is a six-mile, nine station project which will be an extension of the under construction Pasadena Metro Gold Line. The project extends from Union Station to Atlantic Boulevard in East Los Angeles, via Alameda Street, First Street, Indiana Street, Third Street, and Pomona Boulevard.

Contact Information

Name
Ray Sosa
Agency Name
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, City of
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Alameda/1st;1st/Soto;3rd/Mednik;Beverly/Atlantic
Zip
90012-23
Total Acres
3.840
State Highways
60,101,5,10,710
Railways
Metrolink; Freight RR
Waterways
LA River
Township
1S
Range
12-13W
Section
31,32
Base
USGS
Other Location Info
Little Tokyo/Arts District/Boyle Hgts/ELA
Other Information
Section: 36

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print