Placer Vineyards Specific Plan
33 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 1999062020
- Lead Agency
- Placer County
- Document Title
- Placer Vineyards Specific Plan
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 11/17/2016
- Present Land Use
- Undeveloped open land for grazing. Z: Specific Plan (SPL) Mixed-use planned community, including residential, commercial, park and open space, and quasi-public land uses.
- Document Description
- The project proposes a modification of the Placer Vineyards Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Corresponding Text Revisions to the Certified EIR to remove Mitigation Measure 4.1-6 relating to minimum setbacks from the existing 115kV and 230kV power lines that cross the Specific Plan area.
- Contact Information
-
Shirlee Herrington
Placer County Community Development/Resource Agency
3091 County Center Drive
Auburn, CA 95603
Phone : (530) 745-3132
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°44'58"N 121°23'17"W
- Cities
- Auburn
- Counties
- Placer
- Cross Streets
- Watt Avenue & Baseline Road
- Zip
- 95603
- Total Acres
- 58.5
- Parcel #
- 023-200-037
- State Highways
- Hwy 99, I-80
- Railways
- Union Pacific
- Airports
- Holtsmans Private
- Schools
- Coyote Ridge ES, Wilson C. Riles MS
- Waterways
- Curry Creek
- Township
- 11N
- Range
- 5E
- Section
- 35
- Base
- MDB&M
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Placer County
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 3091 County Center Drive, Suite 190, Aubrun, CA 95603
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes