Petition for Change in a Water Right
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1999024003
Lead Agency
United States Bureau of Reclamation
(USBR)
Document Title
Petition for Change in a Water Right
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/27/2008
Document Description
The County of Sacramento and the Sacramento County Water Agency have applied to appropriate 71,000 acre-feet of water per year by permit. The proposed project involves a 185 million gallon per day-capacity (mgd) intake facility and pumping plant located on the Sacramento River near Freeport, use of the City of Sacramento's existing diversion facility near Jibboom Street and pipelines carrying the water from the intake facilities to the Zone 40 Surface Water Treatment Plant and service area. The City of Sacramento prepared a Fish Screen Replacement Project Negative Declaration for the Jibboom Street diversion. The Freeport Regional Water Project EIR and Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration were prepared for the other project elements.
Contact Information
Name
James W. Kassel
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
College Town Dr., State Univ Dr. East
Total Acres
2.5
Parcel #
005-0010-010,0
State Highways
US 50
Waterways
Amer and Sac Rivers
Township
8N
Range
5e
Section
10
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Water Rights Control Board, Division of Water Rights
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.