Proposed Standardized Permit for Filter Recycling Services (FRS)

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1998121039
Lead Agency
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
Document Title
Proposed Standardized Permit for Filter Recycling Services (FRS)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/4/2006
Document Description
FRS accepts multiple waste streams (mostly contaminated containers of various types) and uses shredder/separator units to generate metallic material for recovery at an offsite smelter. The separation units also generate hazardous waste sludges solutions that are landfilled offsite, hazardous organic liquids that are incinerated offsite, and hazardous aqueous solutions that are treated offsite. FRS requested a change in authorization from Standardized Permit Series B to a Standardized Permit Series A. As a Series B Standardized Permit facility, FRS can treat up to 50,000 gallons of liquid waste and up to 100,000 pounds of non-liquid waste per month. FRS reports that its current treatment throughput of hazardous wastes through the two shredding/separating units is about 1,335 tons per month, and about 4.5 tons of aerosol cans through the aerosol can puncturing units.

Contact Information

Name
Veronica La Mar
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Rialto
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
West Monte Avenue, RIverside Avenue
Zip
92316
State Highways
I-10
Railways
Union Pacific
Waterways
West Riverside Canal

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DTSC
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print