State Route 138 Widening Project - Segment 9 (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0121-R5)

17 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1998091007
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, Headquarters
Document Title
State Route 138 Widening Project - Segment 9 (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0121-R5)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/12/2016
Present Land Use
Transportation
Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0121-R5, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Caltrans, as represented by Paul Caron. The project proposes to realign the SR-138 highway centerline northward, widen the existing two-lane highway to standard four-lane highway with median, standardized the shoulder width to eight feet, add a pedestrian sidewalk, and improve sight distance and roadside recovery area, and modify existing drainage systems by extending existing pipes and installing new inlets, pipes, outlets, and two infiltration basins, which will permanently impact 0.47 acres of streambed and associated habitat. The project will mitigate with 1.15 acres of creation and/or restoration.

Contact Information

Name
Victoria Chau
Agency Name
Dept. of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Palmdale
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Avenue T, State Route 138
Schools
Alpine Elementary
Waterways
California Aqueduct, Little Rock Wash and Big Rock Wash
Other Location Info
Nearest town: Littlerock

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print