State Route 138 Widening from Longview Rd. to 146th St Junction, Los Angeles County

17 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1998091007
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, Headquarters
Document Title
State Route 138 Widening from Longview Rd. to 146th St Junction, Los Angeles County
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/10/2006
Present Land Use
Transportation
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game issued a permit in 2005 authorizing the incidental take of Mohave ground squirrels (Spermophilus mohavensis), a state-listed threatened species, during construction of the road improvement project. At this time DFG is approving an amendment that (1) extends the permit's term from December 2006 to April 2008; (2) provides the project sponsor additional time to mitigate for impacts to the Mohave ground squirrel; (3) reduces the amount of habitat impacts authorized under the permit from 225 acres to 53.34 acres; and (4) reduces the mitigation requirements in proportion to the reduction in impacts. The amendment is necessary because of delays in starting the project and because of new information showing considerably less impacts than originally anticipated.

Contact Information

Name
Scott P. Harris
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Palmdale
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Avenue T, State Route 138
Schools
Alpine Elementary
Waterways
California Aqueduct, Little Rock Wash and Big Rock Wash

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print