Order WR 2001-22
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1998082005
Lead Agency
El Dorado Irrigation District
Document Title
Order WR 2001-22
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/23/2001
Present Land Use
Project site is currently developed with water supply and conveyance facilities.
Document Description
During June 1993 and October 1995, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) held a hearing to consider competing petitions for partial assignment of state-filed Application 5645 and related water right applications. On October 2, 1996, the SWRCB adopted Decision 1635. Decision 1635 approved El Dorado Irrigation District's and El Dorado County Water Agency's (hereafter collectively referred to as El Dorado) petition for partial assignment of state-filed Application 5645. The approval authorized El Dorado to divert to storage a total of 32,931 acre-feet per annum (afa) at Lake Aloha, Silver Lake and Caples Lake, and to redivert water released from upstream storage and to directly divert a total of 17,000 afa at Folsom Reservoir. Decision 1635 denied all other applications and petitions for assignment, except the applications by Kirkwood, Inc., which had already been approved.
Contact Information
Name
Andrew Fecko
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Rights
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Alpine
Counties
Amador, El Dorado
State Highways
Highway 50, 88
Waterways
South Fork American Rv
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.