1997 Water General Plan
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1998031109
Lead Agency
Indian Wells Valley Water District
Document Title
1997 Water General Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/27/2005
Document Description
The Capital Improvements and Well 34 Project consists of the construction and maintenance of the following:
1) Springer Avenue B-Zone Pipeline Project will install approximately 14,800 linear feet (LF) of 24-inch polyvinyl (PVC) pipeline and 1,300 LF of 12-inch diameter PVC pipeline.
2) Construct a 2.0 million gallon (MG) B-Zone Reservoir Tank.
3) Sunland Street C-Zone Pipeline Project will install approximately 2,000 LF of new 16-inch PVC pipeline.
4) Construct a 1.0 MG C-Zone Reservoir Tank.
5) Well Plant 34 Project will construct a 16-inch to 20-inch diameter water production well, with an anticipated depth of between 900 and 1,400 feet below ground surface.
The project will result in impacts to the Mohave ground squirrel (Spermophilus mohavensis) and desert tortoise (Gopherus aggassizii), species which are designated as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The permit referenced above as issued by CDFG authorizes incidental take of the species under CESA that may result with implementation of the project.
Contact Information
Name
W. E. Loudermilk
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Ridgecrest
Counties
San Bernardino
State Highways
395/178
Township
26
Range
39
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.