Hamilton Wetland Restoration Plan
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1998031053
Lead Agency
California State Coastal Conservancy
(SCC)
Document Title
Hamilton Wetland Restoration Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/9/2008
Present Land Use
Agriculture; Present Zoning-Bay Front/Conservation -Residential single family planned (1unit /2 acres) Present General Designated Land Use-Agriculture/conservation.
Document Description
Authorize issuance of a General Lease - Public Agency Use to California State Coastal Conservancy, beginning Dec. 3 2008, for a term of 25-years, for restoration of tidal salt marsh and other wetland habitat including placement of up to 650,000 cubic yards of dredged material on site to accelerate tidal wetland establishment; construction of recreational trail; temporary stockpiling of approx. 11,000 cubic yards of asphalt and 3,700 cubic yards of concrete that was removed from the runway/taxiway areas; and removal of temporary bridge at the end of the project.
Contact Information
Name
Paul D. Thayer
Agency Name
California State Lands Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Novato
Counties
Marin
Cross Streets
Bel Marin Keys Boulevard & Montego Key
Zip
94949
Total Acres
1,587 acres
State Highways
101 and 37
Railways
NPRR
Schools
Hamilton
Waterways
Novato Creek, Arroyo San Jose, Pacheco Creek, San Pablo
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California State Lands Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.