Easement Modification Agreement Related to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Mission Bay Project (Pierpoint Lane View Corridor)

15 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1997092068
Lead Agency
San Francisco, City and County of (City and County of San Francisco)
Document Title
Easement Modification Agreement Related to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Mission Bay Project (Pierpoint Lane View Corridor)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/16/2018

Document Description
The project is the approval of an easement modification agreement between the Regents of the University of California and Uber Technologies, Inc. Uber is developing facility in the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Area on Black 26, Parcel 1 and Block 27, Parcel 1, consisting of two multi-story buildings are located on either side of Pierpoint Lane, and Uber will ocnstruct two connecting overhead pedestrian bridges between two Uber office buildings spanning the width of Pierpoint Lane. Approval was required for a variance in the South Plan Mission Bay South Design for Development Design Standards and guidelines as the pedestrian bridges, when constructed, will partially obstruct a view corridor currently owned and maintained on Pierpoint Lane by the Regents. The Regents and Uber have agreed to the easement modification in order to facilitate the construction of the two pedestrian bridges between the Uber Buildings spanning the width of the view easement.

Contact Information
Diane Wong
University of California
1111 Franklin Street, 6th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607

Phone : (415) 502-5952

Location

Cities
San Francisco
Counties
San Francisco
Cross Streets
Pierpoint Lane, Third Street and Bridgeview Way

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
University of California
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
654 Minnesota Street, San Francisco, CA 94143

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search