South Sacramento Corridor Phase 2 Project (California Endangered Species Act [CESA] Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2011-022-02 (ITP) Amendment No. A1)
19 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1996052075
Lead Agency
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Document Title
South Sacramento Corridor Phase 2 Project (California Endangered Species Act [CESA] Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2011-022-02 (ITP) Amendment No. A1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/15/2013
Present Land Use
City of Sac: Urban Corridor High, Suburban Neighborhood Low, Traditional Neighborhood Low/Medium/High, Public/Quasi-Public
Document Description
The proposed project would relocate an existing Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) (69-kilovolt (kV) transmission line and joint pole facilities from within the South Sacramento Corridor Phase 2 (SSCP2) right-of-way. Project components include the placement of new utility poles, conductors, and associated components, and the removal of the existing transmission line and joint pole facilities. The project would include a utility easement to be granted to SMUD, and the placement of access road segments within portions of the easement to facilitate construction and maintenance of the relocated transmission line and joint pole facilities.
Contact Information
Name
Ed Scotfield
Agency Name
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Elk Grove, Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Meadowview Road/Detroit Boulevard
Zip
95832
Total Acres
3
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
Hwy 99
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Sacramento Executive
Schools
Susan B. Anthony ES
Waterways
Morrison Creek, Union House Creek
Township
7N
Range
5E
Section
7/8/17
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.