South Sacramento Corridor Phase 2 Light Rail Extension Project

19 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1996052075
Lead Agency
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Document Title
South Sacramento Corridor Phase 2 Light Rail Extension Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/28/2011
Present Land Use
Multiple: Rail, R-1, Educational, Agricultural
Document Description
Modifications to the approved South Sacramento Corridor Light Rail Phase 2 Extension Project (Blue Line) described as Alternative 2, including: 1) realignment of the proposed along a 0.75 portion of the alignment (Design Option A); 2) adjustment to RT right-of-way to increase distance from the Morrison Creek Levee; 3) relocation of Traction Power Substation No. 10 across Franklin Boulevard; and 4) extension of tailtracks at Cosumnes River College Station by ~400 feet.

Contact Information

Name
Diane Nakano
Agency Name
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Elk Grove, Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Meadowview Road/Detroit Boulevard
Zip
95832
Total Acres
linear
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
Hwy 99
Railways
UPRR
Airports
No
Schools
Susan B. Anthony ES
Waterways
Morrison Creek
Township
7N
Range
5E
Section
7
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print