LRDP Amendment No. 1, Mission Bay Housing
22 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1995123032
Lead Agency
Regents of the University of California
Document Title
LRDP Amendment No. 1, Mission Bay Housing
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/1/2013
Present Land Use
P (Public Use) or RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family).
Land Use: University uses, vacant lot, office space, residential structures (mostly vacant), and a parking lot.
Document Description
The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) propose to develop 22,200 gross square feet (gsf) of existing interior vacant space in the entire extent of the 4th floor of the Diller Building. The vacant 4th floor would be developed with wet laboratory, laboratory support, and office space for School of Medicine clinical cancer researchers. No expansion of the existing building envelope is proposed.
Contact Information
Name
Diane Wong
Agency Name
University of California, San Francisco
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Francisco
Counties
San Francisco
Cross Streets
Various locations on the UCSF Parnassus Heights campus
Zip
94143
Total Acres
~1.5
Jobs
20
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
1, US 101, I-280
Schools
Several
Waterways
Numerous lakes in Golden Gate Park; Mountain Lake in the Presidio
Other Location Info
University of San Francisco
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
University of California
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.