Clinton Keith Road Extension (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2014-0234-R6)

9 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1995062022
Lead Agency
Riverside County
Document Title
Clinton Keith Road Extension (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2014-0234-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/2/2016
Present Land Use
Specific Plan, Residential (Rural and Suburban), School, Vacant

Document Description
CDFW has executed streambed alteration agreement no. 1600-2014-0234-R6 Revision 3, pursuant to section 1602 of the fish and game code to the project applicant, the Riverside County Transportation Department, as represented by Mr. Russell Williams. The project is limited to the impacts to several unnamed ephemera streams and Warm Springs Creek associated with the expansion of Clinton Keith Road from Whitewood Rd to Trois Valley St. The extended section would be six lanes wide and would include a three span bridge over Warm Springs Creek with a total length of approximately 360 ft, and a 114-ft wide, 90-ft long double arch wildlife overcrossing. Infrastructure associated with the expanded road will be installed, including signal lights, culverts, gutters, storm drains, and detention basins. This project is part of a larger effort to extend Clinton Keith Road from Antelope Rd to State Route 79.

Contact Information
Gabriele Quillman
CDFW Inland Deserts
3602 Inland Empire Blvd, #C-220
Ontario, CA 91764

Phone : (909) 484-0167

Location

Cities
Murrieta
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Antelope Menifee
Total Acres
45
Parcel #
N/A
State Highways
I-215
Airports
French Valley
Township
7S
Range
2W
Section
1, 2
Base
SB

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
3602 Inland Empire Blvd, #C-220, Ontario, CA 91764

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search