McCoy Plaza/Cornerstone Estates, GPZ-2001-002, E-2001-022
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1995061054
Lead Agency
City of Santa Maria
Document Title
McCoy Plaza/Cornerstone Estates, GPZ-2001-002, E-2001-022
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/26/2001
Present Land Use
2 single-family houses, retention basins/General PD/R-2 (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) /MDR-12 (Medium Density Residential)
Document Description
The project proposes a General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 4.16 acres from MDR-12 and PD/R-2 to CC (Community Commercial) and PD/C-2. The subsequent projects include subdivisions, Planned Development Permits and Use Permits to allow development of up to 163 single-family lots on 16.31 acres, 14,300 sf mixed use commercial space with 15 second floor apartments, a 3,100 sf fast-food restaurant (or bank) with a drive up window, and an 80 unit assisted living facility. The project also creates a 1.6 acre dual use recreation/stormwater retention basin that is designated ROS and zoned PD/OS.
Contact Information
Name
Bill Shipsey
Agency Name
City of Santa Maria
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Santa Maria
Counties
Santa Barbara
Cross Streets
Miller Street and McCoy Lane
Total Acres
22.32
Parcel #
128-129-006
State Highways
US 101, SR 135
Railways
SMVRR
Airports
Santa Maria (SMX)
Schools
SM-Bonita, Orcutt Union & S MJUHS Districts
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Santa Maria
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.