Gregory Canyon Landfill; New Bridge Crossing of the San Luis Rey River

14 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1995061007
Lead Agency
San Diego County
Document Title
Gregory Canyon Landfill; New Bridge Crossing of the San Luis Rey River
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/14/2009
Document Description
The Gregory Canyon, Ltd, LLC proposes to alter the stream to construct a new bridge crossing of the San Luis Rey River to accommodate the ingress and egress of traffic to and from the Gregory Canyon Landfill Property. This brisge will replace an existing bridge crossing located downstream that cannot support the equipment associated with landfill activities. The proposed bridge will be ~640 ft in length and 35.5 ft wide. It will have 5 sets of one piles which will form the base. The bridge will maintain a 17.5 ft clearance above the river bed. The side slopes at the abutments will be at a 3:1 slope and will be stabilized with rip-rap to prevent erosion. Gaps in the rip rap will be filled with concrete to eliminate habitat for predator species. This bridge is a component of the larger landfill project.

Contact Information

Name
Marilyn Fluharty
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Pala, Pauma Valley, Pauma Valley
Cross Streets
Couser Canyon Road
Total Acres
~ 1,770
Parcel #
38 APNS
State Highways
SR-76
Waterways
San Luis Rey River
Township
9S
Section
32, 33
Base
SBM
Other Location Info
9708 Pala Road, Pala, California

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CalRecycle
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print