Interceptor Master Plan 2000
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1995012061
Lead Agency
Sacramento County
Document Title
Interceptor Master Plan 2000
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/15/2003
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The proposed project updates the 1993/94 Sacramento Sewerage Expansion Study (SSES). The major differences between the 1993/94 SSES and the proposed Master Plan 2000 are: 1) revised land use and population projections, 2) revised build out density and flow contributions, and 3) changes in interceptor framework. Interceptor Master Plan 2000 uses geographically based sewer billing information to predict existing wastewater flows, and Sacramento Area Council of Governments geographically based population projections to predict areas of future growth and increased development densities. Proposed changes in the interceptor framework are: the realigning of the Lower Northwest Interceptor from midtown Sacramento to Yolo County and the City of West Sacramento; providing a new Interceptor to serve Aerojet; realigning a segment of the Bradshaw Interceptor through the Mather Field area; and relocating the Deer Creek Interceptor to Grantline Road.
Contact Information
Name
Gerry Costan
Agency Name
Sacramento County Sanitation District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento, West Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento, Yolo
Waterways
Sacramento and American Rivers and tributaries
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. You may also contact the OPR via email at state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov or via phone at (916) 445-0613.