Approval of An Explanation of Significant Difference for the Removal of Additional Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination for the Union Pacific Curtis P
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1994042023
Lead Agency
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC)
Document Title
Approval of An Explanation of Significant Difference for the Removal of Additional Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination for the Union Pacific Curtis P
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/28/2005
Document Description
The ESD was prepared because the boundary for the remediation area has been extended to include an additional 6.98 acres from the Active Yard. The adjustment of the remediation area will result in an increase removal of 4,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil from the site beyond the initial estimated volumes and time frames estimated in a Remedial Action Plan approved by DTSC in 1995. While these increases significantly change the scope of the project as previously approved, they do not fundamentally alter the remedy selected in the 1995 RAP nor cleanup levels, thus not requiring a formal RAP amendment.
Contact Information
Name
Thomas Tse
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substance Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
SUTTERVILLE AND 24TH
Parcel #
013-0010-001
Township
8N
Range
5E
Section
18
Base
DIABLO
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.