Concurrence with the issuance of a New Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Otay Mesa Compost Facility in the County of San Diego, Facility No. 37-AA-0988
35 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1992101099
Lead Agency
San Diego County
Document Title
Concurrence with the issuance of a New Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Otay Mesa Compost Facility in the County of San Diego, Facility No. 37-AA-0988
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/11/2024
Document Description
The changes that will be authorized by the concurrence of the new proposed SWFP
include: the permitting of a fully permitted composting facility that will receive food
material, green material, wood waste, vegetative material, manure and agricultural
material; permitted hours will be Sunday through Saturday, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.;
permitted maximum tonnage will be 500 tons per day; permitted acreage will be 7.13
acres; the design capacity will be 30,000 cubic yards; and the annual capacity will be
180,000 cubic yards.
Contact Information
Name
Cody Oquendo
Agency Name
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Cities
Chula Vista
Counties
San Diego
Regions
Southern California
Cross Streets
434 Alta Road
Zip
92154
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
San Diego
Final Environmental Document Available at
Custodian of Records, CalRecycle, Attn: Legal Office, 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812-4025
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes (Addendum)
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No