Route 238 (Mission Boulevard) Spot Improvement Project in Hayward, Union City and Fremont, Alameda County.

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1991083054
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, Headquarters
Document Title
Route 238 (Mission Boulevard) Spot Improvement Project in Hayward, Union City and Fremont, Alameda County.
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/6/2002
Document Description
The operator proposes to do a seismic retrofit and expansion of the Alameda Creek Bridge, located on Route 238 (Mission Boulevard), Fremont, Alameda County, to improve traffic flow from Fremont to Union City. The project will add two lanes and shoulders to the existing bridge, widening it from 57 feet to 118 feet. The new additions will match the existing structure. The existing pier walls will be extended on both sides of the bridge from 10.03 to 10.8 meters on the south side and 5.8 to 9.1 meters on the north. The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number R3-2001-0231 pursuant to Section 1601 of the Fish and Game Code to the project operator, Christine Monsen/Alameda County Transportation Authority.

Contact Information

Name
Greg Martinelli
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Fremont
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
98TH AVE
Total Acres
7
State Highways
I-880
Railways
BART
Airports
OAKLAND
Waterways
SAN LEANDRO CREEK

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print