FRE-180 Kings Canyon Expressway Segment 3 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2013-0194-R4) Major Amendment No. 7

SCH Number: 1991022072
Lead Agency: Caltrans 6 (Fresno) (California Department of Transportation, District 6)
Document Title: FRE-180 Kings Canyon Expressway Segment 3 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2013-0194-R4) Major Amendment No. 7
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 5/14/2019

Document Description: The California Department offish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Amendment No. 7, a major amendment to the already amended Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA) number 1600-2013-0194-R4, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Project Applicant, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The Project involves activities related to roadway realignment and widening work on SR 180 where it crosses over the Centerville-Kingsburg Canal, China Slough, Collins Creek, the Kings River, Cameron Slough, Byrd Slough, the Carmelita Canal, and the Mount Campbell Canal. This Major Amendment No. 7 amends the Agreement reflecting changes to the planned water diversion at Collins Creek.

Contact Information: Steve Hulbert
Department of Fish and Wildlife Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710
(559)243-8147

Cities: Fresno
Counties: Fresno
Other Location Info: The Project is generally located along State· Route (SR) 180 between Post Mile 74.1 and 78.6, southeast of the city of Fresno in Fresno County, California

Approving Agency: CDFW
Approving Agency Role: Responsible Agency
Approved On: 5/14/2019
Final EIR Available Location: California Department of Transportation 2015 East Shields Avenue, Suite 100 Fresno, California 93726 Contact: Neil Bretz Phone: (559) 243-3465

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No