Concurrence in the issuance of a Modified Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for the Stanton Recycling and Transfer Facility, SWIS Number 30-AB-0013
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1990010501
Lead Agency
City of Stanton
Document Title
Concurrence in the issuance of a Modified Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for the Stanton Recycling and Transfer Facility, SWIS Number 30-AB-0013
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/7/2025
Document Description
The modified SWFP will allow for the following: reducing the permitted area from 11.0 acres to 10.7 acres; updating the legal description of the facility, Enforcement Agency (EA) findings, prohibitions, documents that describe and/or restrict the operation of the facility, self-monitoring, and EA conditions.
Contact Information
Name
Megan Emslander
Agency Name
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Stanton
Counties
Orange
Regions
Statewide
Other Information
11232 Knott Ave. Stanton, CA 90680
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Orange
Final Environmental Document Available at
This is to certify that the record of project approval by CalRecycle is available to the general public at: Custodian of Records, CalRecycle, Attn: Legal Office, 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812-4025.
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No