Silva Valley Parkway Interchange Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report

10 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1988050215
Lead Agency
El Dorado County
Document Title
Silva Valley Parkway Interchange Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/5/2012
Present Land Use
Residential High Density and Commercial

Document Description
The 71-acre Silva Valley Parkway Interchange Project consists of construction of a new interchange along Highway 50 between El Dorado Hills Boulevard and Latrobe Road Interchange and the Bass Lake Road Interchange, near the existing Clarksville Road undercrossing. The purpose of the project is to accommodate planned growth to accommodate commercial and residential development within the immediate areas surrounding the proposed interchange. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was approved in 2011.

Contact Information
Genevieve Sparks
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Phone : (916) 464-4745

Location

Coordinates
38°39.6'"N 121°3.0'"W
Counties
El Dorado
Cross Streets
U.S. Highway 50 and Silva Valley Parkway
Zip
95762
State Highways
U.S. Hwy 50
Schools
Oak Meadow Elementary
Waterways
Carson Creek
Township
9N
Range
8E
Section
1
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: El Dorado Hills

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board 11020 Sun Center Drive #200, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search