Silva Valley Parkway Interchange Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
10 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 1988050215
- Lead Agency
- El Dorado County
- Document Title
- Silva Valley Parkway Interchange Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 7/5/2012
- Present Land Use
- Residential High Density and Commercial
- Document Description
- The 71-acre Silva Valley Parkway Interchange Project consists of construction of a new interchange along Highway 50 between El Dorado Hills Boulevard and Latrobe Road Interchange and the Bass Lake Road Interchange, near the existing Clarksville Road undercrossing. The purpose of the project is to accommodate planned growth to accommodate commercial and residential development within the immediate areas surrounding the proposed interchange. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was approved in 2011.
- Contact Information
-
Genevieve Sparks
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 464-4745
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°39.6'"N 121°3.0'"W
- Counties
- El Dorado
- Cross Streets
- U.S. Highway 50 and Silva Valley Parkway
- Zip
- 95762
- State Highways
- U.S. Hwy 50
- Schools
- Oak Meadow Elementary
- Waterways
- Carson Creek
- Township
- 9N
- Range
- 8E
- Section
- 1
- Base
- MDB&M
- Other Location Info
- City/Nearest Community: El Dorado Hills
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board 11020 Sun Center Drive #200, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- Yes
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes