Delta Wetlands
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1988020824
Lead Agency
Semitropic Water Storage District
Document Title
Delta Wetlands
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/15/2011
Present Land Use
Bacon Island & Bouldin Island (San Joaquin County): AG-80 (General Agriculture)
Webb Tract (Contra Costa County): A-2 (General Agriculture) & A-4 (Agricultural Preserve District)
Holland Tract (Contra Costa County): A-2 (General Agriculture) & A-3 (Heavy Agricultural District)
Document Description
The Semitropic Water Storage District is proposing the Delta Wetlands Project. Semitropic is a public water agency located in Kern County that provides water to nearly 300 customers for the irrigation of ~140,000 acres for agricultural uses. The Project would provide water to Semitropic to augment its water supply, would bank water within the Semitropic Groundwater Storage Bank and Antelope Valley Water Bank, and would provide water to the following places of use: Semitropic, Golden State Water Company, Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County, and the member agencies within the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
Contact Information
Name
Wilmar L. Boschman
Agency Name
Semitropic Water Storage District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Contra Costa, San Joaquin
Total Acres
20,357
State Highways
SR 12
Railways
Santa Fe Railways Amtrak Line
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
San Joaquin River, Old River, Middle River
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Rio Vista
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Semitropic Water Storage District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.