Village 34 General Plan Amendment & Zone Change (Lake Forest Drive/Bake Parkway Extension Development Project)
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1985120404
Lead Agency
City of Irvine
Document Title
Village 34 General Plan Amendment & Zone Change (Lake Forest Drive/Bake Parkway Extension Development Project)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/29/2008
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2005-0612-R5 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant. The operator proposes to alter the above-named streams to construct the project. As proposed the project is for the construction of the Lake Forest Drive Extension and the Bake Parkway Extension Projects. Lake Forest Drive would be extended northwest from its existing terminus to Laguna Canyon Road. Two bridges, each with a maximum span of 140 feet, are proposed for the crossing of Veeh and Needlegrass Creeks, tributaries to San Diego Creek. Bake Parkway would be extended southwest approximately 875 feet from its existing terminus to Lake Forest Drive and would include a maximum 140-foot bridge span over San Diego Creek.
Contact Information
Name
Naeem Siddiqui
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Irvine
Counties
Orange
Cross Streets
SAN DIEGO/SANTA ANA FREEWYS/FUTURE BAKE PKWY
Total Acres
543
Jobs
17892
State Highways
I-5,I-405
Railways
ATSF
Airports
MCAS EL TORO
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.