SCH Number,Lead Agency Name,Lead Agency Title,Lead Agency Acronym,Document Title,Document Type,Received,Posted,Document Description,Document Portal URL,Project Title,Contact Full Name,Contact Authority,Contact Job Title,Contact Email Address,Contact Address 1,Contact Address 2,Contact City,Contact State,Contact Zip Code,Contact Phone Number,Location Coordinates,Cities,Counties,County Clerks,Location Cross Streets,Location Zip Code,Location Total Acres,Location Parcel Number,Location State Highways,Location Waterways,Location Airports,NOC Has Non Late Comment,NOC State Review Start Date,NOC State Review End Date,NOC Development Type,NOC Local Action,NOC Project Issues,NOC Local Review Start Date,NOC Local Review End Date,NOE Exempt Status,NOE Exempt Citation,NOE Reasons for Exemption,NOD Agency,NOD Approved By Lead Agency,NOD Approved Date,NOD Significant Environmental Impact,NOD Environmental Impact Report Prepared,NOD Negative Declaration Prepared,NOD Other Document Type,NOD Mitigation Measures,NOD Mitigation Reporting Or Monitoring Plan,NOD Statement Of Overriding Considerations Adopted,NOD Findings Made Pursuant,NOD Final EIR Available Location 2022050080,"Toxic Substances Control, Department of",Department of Toxic Substances Control,,Safer Consumer Products: Listing Treatments Containing PFASs for Use on Converted Textiles or Leathers as a Priority Product ,NOE,5/5/2022,5/5/2022,"The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), pursuant to authority granted by Health and Safety Code Sections 25252, 25253, and 58012, approved a regulatory amendment to amend section 69511 and add section 69511.5 to Article 11, Chapter 55, Division 4.5 of Title 22, California Code of Regulations. The proposed action will add one new Priority Product, Treatments Containing Perfluoroalkyl or Polyfluoroalkyl Substances for Use on Converted Textiles or Leathers, to the Priority Products List (Article 11). ",https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2022050080,Safer Consumer Products: Listing Treatments Containing PFASs for Use on Converted Textiles or Leathers as a Priority Product ,Simona Balan,Department of Toxic Substances Control,Senior Environmental Scientist (Specialist),simona.balan@dtsc.ca.gov,"P.O. Box 806, 1001 I Street, 12th Floor",,Sacramento,CA,95812-0806,5105403888,,,"Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Ventura, Yolo, Yuba","Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, Ventura, Yolo, Yuba",Statewide,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Categorical Exemption, Feasibility or Planning Study [14 CCR § 15262]; Data Collection [14 CCR §15306],"This Priority Product listing requires notifications from any manufacturer of the Priority Product if its product is sold in California and the possible creation of reports that evaluate alternatives to the Priority Product. DTSC cannot anticipate how individual manufacturers will choose to comply with the regulation, and DTSC cannot mandate a particular response. For instance: · Any number of manufacturers may elect to stop selling their product in California once the rule is final, or even before. · Any number of manufacturers may elect to stop producing a particular formula of a suite of products that they currently manufacture to avoid using the named Chemical of Concern. · Any number of manufacturers may elect to complete an Abridged Alternatives Analysis. · Any number of manufacturers may elect to complete a two-stage Alternatives Analysis and propose to adopt an alternative product. · DTSC may need to evaluate Alternatives Analysis Reports and determine if one or more regulatory responses are necessary to address remaining potential exposures or adverse impacts based on the outcome of the reports. It would therefore be speculative to predict how many (or if any) manufacturers would choose a particular compliance pathway. Further regulatory action is not legally compelled or presumed by DTSC’s decision to list the Priority Product. DTSC finds that the Alternatives Analysis process meets the definition of a feasibility or planning study for possible future action that has not yet been approved, adopted, or funded (14 CCR § 15262). Any regulatory response that DTSC may impose following its review of an Alternatives Analysis Report will be subject to CEQA requirements at the point of determination. Such regulatory responses cannot be determined until after the Alternatives Analysis has been completed. Additionally, DTSC has no evidence of potential direct or indirect physical change to the environment that would result from the required notifications, creation of Alternatives Analysis Reports, or the two automatic regulatory responses that would be triggered by the submittal of an Abridged Alternatives Analysis Report. DTSC has no evidence that this regulation would result in a change in any of the physical conditions within California, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance. DTSC received no comments during the rulemaking public comment period that indicated an adverse environmental impact from the proposed rulemaking.",,,,,,,,,,,,